Not resolved
1.3
Details
Price Affordability
Product or Service Quality
Staff
5 comments

Scott McMillan, La Mesa, was fined WITH his client by San Diego Superior Court for almost $16,000 and is now fighting a losing battle in the Court of Appeal Case No.D069051 where the court is on the *** of not entertaining the appeal McMillan Law Firm filed.

It is horrible Scott McMillan put his client in jeopardy of paying thousands of dollars.To make matters worse, McMillan Law Firm is suing Nordstroms who hired a Los Angeles law firm who doesn't play 'nice nice' like San Diego attorneys do.

This reviewer shared experience about not as described and wants this business to "for scott mcmillan la mesa attorney to dislcose to clients his huge loss rate, and he graduated from an unaccredited law school". The author is overall dissatisfied with The Mcmillan Law Firm and uploaded a picture. Reviewer wants customer support to reach out to him or her ASAP for further discussion of this matter.

Also, you can continue reading comments about The Mcmillan Law Firm.

Check out the best and the worst companies in Lawyers category for more informed decision or compare The Mcmillan Law Firm to other companies on our site.

Had an Experience with The Mcmillan Law Firm?

Write a review

Comments

Terms of Service
Post Comment
Cancel
scottmc63
San Diego, California, United States #1209221
The Mcmillan Law Firm Verified Representative

This is posted by Scott McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm, APC, the subject of the post.

The statement: "Scott McMillan, La Mesa, was fined WITH his client by San Diego Superior Court for almost $16,000 and is now fighting a losing battle in the Court of Appeal Case No.D069051 where the court is on the *** of not entertaining the appeal McMillan Law Firm filed.It is horrible Scott McMillan put his client in jeopardy of paying thousands of dollars.To make matters worse, McMillan Law Firm is suing Nordstroms who hired a Los Angeles law firm who doesn't play 'nice nice' like San Diego attorneys do."

The Court of Appeal did not dismiss the appeal.

The order of discovery sanctions was reversed on appeal. See http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D069051.PDF

The McMillan Law Firm fearlessly represents individuals and small businesses that are being oppressed by others, whether those others are neighbors, employers, businesses, government, or sociopaths with mental disorders.

The poster here is likely a criminal by the name of Darren Chaker, a convicted felon. A small fraction of his past court proceedings is available for review here: http://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/index.php?action=displaycat&catid=478

Chaker, is a vexatious litigant, and is barred from filing new court cases without an attorney, unless he first obtains permission.

See http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/vexlit.pdf Chaker was defeated by the McMillan...

Show more
Anonymous
to scottmc63 Los Angeles, California, United States #1214367

Vexatious Litigants Clog the Courts With Lost Cases - McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, Scott_McMillan_La_Mesa , like the below cases McMillan Law Firm Lost and has wet dreams of taking over domain names LOL LOL LOL

A few of the most recent loses of Scott McMillan

• Williams v.Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct.

37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and his counsel, were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal, see Case Number D069051

• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)

• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v.

The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]

• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P. et al.

Case Number D066876 (lost appeal) • McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc.D067610 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL (case where law firm was sued by Yelp!

for posting its OWN REVIEWS – lost writ petition) • Kelegian v. Anders et al., Case Number D067328 (Transfer/certification denied) • Williams v. Digius et al. Case No.

D064183 (opposed defendant’s appeal and lost) • Oceans Eleven Casino v. Anders, Case Number S219395 (lost California Supreme Court case) • Bridgeman v.

Allen et al., Case Number D062183 (lost appeal AND McMillan’s client forced to pay costs of...

Show more
scottmc63
to Anonymous San Diego, California, United States #1214563
The Mcmillan Law Firm Verified Representative

The facts:

- Sanction order REVERSED in Williams v.Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct.

37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, The Court of Appeal did not dismiss the appeal. The order of discovery sanctions was reversed on appeal. See http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D069051.PDF

- Although writ was denied, later appeal in Williams was successful.

- McMillan Law Firm did not post its own reviews, it represented the defendant that was falsely accused of posting reviews. Case was later dismissed.

- McMillan won the Oceans 11 v.

Anders case.

- McMillan won the Williams v. Digius appeal, in part. - Bridgeman was not "forced to pay costs." - McMillan won Morton v.

Spotts, defendant was required to pay McMillan's client $15k in punitive damages.And regarding the domain names, here is the order on that to take the domain names of David Hunter aka Darren Chaker, fraudster and repeatedly convicted felon: http://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/index.php?action=displaycat&catid=483

Anonymous
#1170199

A few of the most recent loses by Scott McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm , in La Mesa, California.

• Williams v.Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct.

37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and his counsel, were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal.

• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)

• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v.

The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]

• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P.

et al.Case Number D066876 (lost appeal)

scottmc63
to Anonymous San Diego, California, United States #1212675
The Mcmillan Law Firm Verified Representative

The false statements above are rebutted with reference to the evidence in the prior comment, other than the false claim that the McMillan Law Firm posted its own reviews.Nobody posted their own review.

The McMillan Law Firm represented The McMillan Law Group.

McMillan Law Group was alleged, falsely, of posting its own reviews.It didn't.

You May Also Like