The Mcmillan Law Firm - Scott McMillan Law Firm - La Mesa - Malpractice

5 of 6 The Mcmillan Law Firm reviews

Scott McMillan, La Mesa, was fined WITH his client by San Diego Superior Court for almost $16,000 and is now fighting a losing battle in the Court of Appeal Case No.D069051 where the court is on the *** of not entertaining the appeal McMillan Law Firm filed.

It is horrible Scott McMillan put his client in jeopardy of paying thousands of dollars.To make matters worse, McMillan Law Firm is suing Nordstroms who hired a Los Angeles law firm who doesn't play 'nice nice' like San Diego attorneys do.

This review is a subjective opinion of a user.
Report Comment Private message author

More Review Details

Price Affordability
Product or Service Quality
Staff

Reason of review:
Not as described
Preferred solution:
For Scott McMillan La Mesa Attorney to dislcose to clients his huge loss rate, and he graduated from an unaccredited law school.
Review category
Lawyers
review #744929
Had an experience with The Mcmillan Law Firm? Submit review ›
Helpful? 53 Yes 53 1 No 1
Had the same issue 8 Yes 8
5 of 6 The Mcmillan Law Firm reviews
Comment as anonymous As anonymous or Log in
scottmc63

Sep 07 #1209221 San Diego, California, United States

The Mcmillan Law Firm verified representative

This is posted by Scott McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm, APC, the subject of the post.
The statement: "Scott McMillan, La Mesa, was fined WITH his client by San Diego Superior Court for almost $16,000 and is now fighting a losing battle in the Court of Appeal Case No.D069051 where the court is on the *** of not entertaining the appeal McMillan Law Firm filed. It is horrible Scott McMillan put his client in jeopardy of paying thousands of dollars.To make matters worse, McMillan Law Firm is suing Nordstroms who hired a Los Angeles law firm who doesn't play 'nice nice' like San Diego attorneys do."
The Court of Appeal did not dismiss the appeal. The order of discovery sanctions was reversed on appeal. See http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D069051.PDF
The McMillan Law Firm fearlessly represents individuals and small businesses that are being oppressed by others, whether those others are neighbors, employers, businesses, government, or sociopaths with mental disorders.
The poster here is likely a criminal by the name of Darren Chaker, a convicted felon. A small fraction of his past court proceedings is available for review here: http://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/index.php?action=displaycat&catid=478
Chaker, is a vexatious litigant, and is barred from filing new court cases without an attorney, unless he first obtains permission. See http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/vexlit.pdf Chaker was defeated by the McMillan Law Firm in a landmark decision of the
... Show more

0 1 Reply
Anonymous

Sep 18 #1214367 Los Angeles, California, United States

Vexatious Litigants Clog the Courts With Lost Cases - McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, Scott_McMillan_La_Mesa , like the below cases McMillan Law Firm Lost and has wet dreams of taking over domain names LOL LOL LOL
A few of the most recent loses of Scott McMillan
• Williams v. Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct. 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and his counsel, were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal, see Case Number D069051
• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)
• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]
• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P. et al. Case Number D066876 (lost appeal) • McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc.D067610 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL (case where law firm was sued by Yelp! for posting its OWN REVIEWS – lost writ petition) • Kelegian v. Anders et al., Case Number D067328 (Transfer/certification denied) • Williams v. Digius et al. Case No. D064183 (opposed defendant’s appeal and lost) • Oceans Eleven Casino v. Anders, Case Number S219395 (lost California Supreme Court case) • Bridgeman v. Allen et al., Case Number D062183 (lost appeal AND McMillan’s client forced to pay costs of respondent) • Morton v. Spotts, Case Number D058640 (McMillan lost appeal – his
... Show more

3 1 Reply
scottmc63

Sep 18 #1214563 San Diego, California, United States

The Mcmillan Law Firm verified representative

The facts:
- Sanction order REVERSED in Williams v. Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct. 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, The Court of Appeal did not dismiss the appeal. The order of discovery sanctions was reversed on appeal. See http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D069051.PDF
- Although writ was denied, later appeal in Williams was successful.
- McMillan Law Firm did not post its own reviews, it represented the defendant that was falsely accused of posting reviews. Case was later dismissed.
- McMillan won the Oceans 11 v. Anders case.
- McMillan won the Williams v. Digius appeal, in part. - Bridgeman was not "forced to pay costs." - McMillan won Morton v. Spotts, defendant was required to pay McMillan's client $15k in punitive damages. And regarding the domain names, here is the order on that to take the domain names of David Hunter aka Darren Chaker, fraudster and repeatedly convicted felon: http://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/index.php?action=displaycat&catid=483

0 1 Reply
Anonymous

Jun 08 #1170199

A few of the most recent loses by Scott McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm , in La Mesa, California.
• Williams v. Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct. 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and his counsel, were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal.
• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)
• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]
• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P. et al. Case Number D066876 (lost appeal)

19 0 Reply
scottmc63

Sep 14 #1212675 San Diego, California, United States

The Mcmillan Law Firm verified representative

The false statements above are rebutted with reference to the evidence in the prior comment, other than the false claim that the McMillan Law Firm posted its own reviews. Nobody posted their own review. The McMillan Law Firm represented The McMillan Law Group. McMillan Law Group was alleged, falsely, of posting its own reviews. It didn't.

0 0 Reply
Great comment! Would you like to convert it into review?

You will be able to edit the text before publishing.

× You are about to contact PissedConsumer.com

Review submitted through "Contact Us" will not get published on the site or forwarded to The Mcmillan Law Firm. However, many companies do monitor reviews on our site.

 
×
You were reading a complaint about The Mcmillan Law Firm.
Filing a new complaint about
×